Three links. What do they actually support?
The answer ends with a bibliography: a model announcement, an article about that announcement and the manufacturer’s home page. It looks solid. Only after opening the links can you see whether they support what the model just wrote. The number of references tells us little on its own.
Take the sentence: “The new model is available to everyone and handles documents better.” There are at least three things to check: whether it has been released, who can access it and what improved. One announcement may answer some of those questions, but not necessarily all.
Findings first, article later
Start with the manufacturer’s announcement, documentation and release notes. Then look for an independent test of the task you care about. Three accounts of one announcement do not become three independent confirmations. They might, however, suggest a question we have not asked yet.
Beside important information, record the conditions and date checked. Access through an API — from your own program — may differ from access in an app. A benchmark result, from a set of comparison tasks, may concern a particular configuration. If those details disappear from our notes, they will be difficult to recover while writing.
At this stage, ask AI to organize the material. The finished story can wait. A list of findings is easier to inspect than a fluent paragraph in which facts and conclusions have merged.
“For everyone” is quite a promise
Scan the draft for “first,” “best,” “everyone,” “always” and “unlimited.” Return to the source for each one. Access for users of plan X is different from access for everyone. Readers need that condition to know whether the news even applies to them.
Check dates too. Today’s article may describe last year’s release, while documentation high in search results covers an old version. If sources contradict one another, record the discrepancy and revisit the relevant announcement or product. The more convenient sentence does not settle the disagreement.
Hand over a topic someone else can pick up
The writer needs confirmed facts, a meaningful limitation and unanswered questions. Leave a direct link with each finding. Try reading the package without the chat history: can you open the document and reconstruct the conclusion? If not, provide a more precise link or remove the guess.
In the article, put the link near the information it supports. Label your own comparison or prediction as an editorial assessment. Keep the dated note after publication too. When the manufacturer changes the documentation, you will have something to revisit and use to explain a correction.
Sources and further reading
The sources behind this article. Instructions and example scenarios are suggestions from our editorial team.